Thing 1: The Trump administration is forcibly taking migrant children from their parents and placing them in separate detention centers to “deter” illegal immigration.
Thing 2: The US government has lost some of the children.
WHY WOULD THEY DO THIS?
CALL TO ACTION!
Being outraged and upset is not enough. Posting on Facebook is not enough. If we can't stop this in the United States, we can't stop it anywhere.
Republicans like to say that we need a free market in healthcare (and everything else!). Republicans are wrong -- either they don’t understand, or they are lying to us. I’ll show you why.
A market is a system where sellers offer their goods/ services/labor in exchange for money from buyers. A free market is one where prices are determined by unrestricted competition between privately owned businesses. In the real world we have mostly free markets rather than truly free markets. That’s because we have things like licensing, regulation, public sector competition, etc. Decent examples of free markets are commodities (wheat, corn, steel, oil), apps for your phone, and to some degree labor/wages.
There are requirements to be a well functioning free market:
Finally, when you are thinking about all this free market stuff, you have to consider that this is a very large country with 350 million people. What would work for 1,000 people will not work for millions. There is a reason that every single other developed country has some degree of universal coverage. Free markets simply do not work for health care.
So there. Now you know more about free markets than your GOP Senator or Representative. Who said economics was hard? *wink*
Montana, we have a problem.
In less than 14 days GOP Senate wants to
And they want to do it with
Don't just sit there.
Get on the phone. Burn down the phones. Melt the faxes. Show up at offices. Get in the paper and on the news. And get your friends to do the same.
How will the GOP AHCA affect Montana?
What can you do?
Get moving. The life you save could be your own. Or your child's.
The Missoulian is wrong about Greg Gianforte. Wrong for Governor. Wrong for House. Wrong for Montana.
Today The Missoulian endorsed Greg Gianforte for Montana’s sole House seat (here). A whole lot of living, breathing Missoulians are left confused and outraged by this, especially right on the heels of a Missoulian article that said Gianforte lied to us about protecting health care. Just one month ago the editorial board was whining that Gianforte treats the press as an enemy. The Missoulian also seems to have forgotten that they thought Gianforte was a terrible candidate for governor just 7 months ago, when they said he had no interest in public service, was resistant to transparency and quick to shut down discussion, and had to remind him that voters were not customers, we’re the boss.
Why in the world would The Missoulian endorse a candidate they found totally unacceptable seven months ago? He's the same guy, with the same positions, trying to buy a different elected office. Today’s endorsement is a dirty trick by the Missoulian and its corporate masters, and a bald-faced, turncoat, power grab to attempt to influence a close election.
The Missoulian’s “reasons” for the endorsement are very thin, almost laughable:
I guess The Missoulian hasn’t been watching Gianforte over the last several years, because his actions speak a whole lot louder than his words.
So what has Gianforte been doing?
Of course, we can look at Gianforte’s words, too…..
It just doesn't make sense. Today The Missoulian endorsed a candidate they found totally unacceptable seven months ago. He's the same guy, with the same positions, trying to buy a different elected office. This endorsement is a dirty trick by The Missoulian and its corporate masters.
You can do two things: Cancel your subscription, and VOTE.
You are going to save Montana. Yes, YOU. You are going to do it the way the Founders intended -- via the ballot box.
Turn on the TV. Even people who lived through Watergate have not seen anything like this. There are Russian agents all over the Administration. Economic inequality is destroying our economy, and the Administration is determined to make it worse. Health care as we know it may be done, because the richest 400 people in the country want a $600 billion tax cut. The planet is warming faster than any of the models, and the Administration wants out of the climate accords and to increase fossil fuel extraction. North Korea keeps threatening nuclear war, and the Administration is goading them on. It’s too much for any one of us to fix. But you know what? No single one of us has to. We just have to do what we can do. And what we can do is save Montana first.
The special election to fill our sole House seat is on May 25. We can flip this seat and put a Democrat in Congress to look out for our interests and try to put the brakes on whatever chaos the Administration tries to bring.
You have a ballot. If you don’t have one, you can get one.
VOTE. Vote for Rob Quist.
If you have an absentee ballot, fill it out and get it in the mail, or drop it off. If you don’t have a ballot, you can early vote. Just go to your county early voting location, fill out a form, get a ballot fill it out, and hand it back. Here’s the list of early voting locations for every county in Montana: CLICK HERE.
Billings (Yellowstone County): 217 N 27th St M-F 8-5
Bozeman (Gallatin County): 311 W Main, Rm 203
Great Falls (Cascade County): Fairgrounds M-F 7-5
Helena (Lewis & Clark County): 316 N Park Ave Rm 168 M-F 8-5
Missoula (Missoula County): Fairgrounds (South Ave entrance). M-F 8-5
We are going to need every single seat we can get in the US House of Representatives. That’s not just a midterm issue, it’s a right now thing. RIGHT NOW. We have to flip this seat. I don’t care if Quist is your favorite Democratic candidate or not (Disclosure: He’s not my favorite.). That really does not matter. He is not Greg Gianforte. He will not be a Trump puppet. So you have to vote for him. You can’t sit this one out, and you can’t cast a protest vote. Suck it up, buttercup.
Your country needs you. Your planet needs you. Your children need you.
Let’s start with this: Investment in renewable energy is not an extreme position.
Montanans want to see smart development of Montana's natural resources and development of new energy technologies. Montanans want to put us on the cutting edge of wind and solar power. In an age where countries are going 100% green, Montana has to develop a more competitive energy portfolio. We’re in a great position to do just that.
Montana has the geography to be a leader in renewable energy. We can build a strong, diverse energy economy. That means more than keeping the lights on. It means good paying jobs, low unemployment, increased revenue for infrastructure and other critical needs, development of new and innovative technologies and methods, and bringing new life to communities across the state.
Renewable energy is where it’s at nationally:
Renewable energy is feasible in Montana:
We need investments in clean energy technologies that keep jobs in Montana. We need investment in renewables, to keep our energy dollars at home. Renewable energy will grow the economy of towns all across Montana, and we will do our share to help the US achieve energy independence. We can only do that if state laws encourage investment in renewable energy and the jobs associated with it. Right now, that’s a big problem for us.
We have serious, committed blockers to renewable energy growth in Montana. Not surprisingly, the most influential of these are Northwest Energy and the Montana Republican Party. Removing the obstacles to qualified innovators in Montana’s energy industry — letting the free market work — will be critical to our shared goal of ensuring low-cost, reliable, and clean power is generated here in Montana for distribution to near and far markets in the coming decades.
The Job Killing Republicans in the Montana state legislature recently killed the Solar Jobs and Energy Freedom Act (HB 504). That bill would have given Montana residents and businesses the flexibility and freedom to allow solar energy to grow in Montana. It would have reformed Montana’s solar energy policies to reflect the advances in technology and cost reductions seen across the solar industry over the last 10 years. It would have led to the growth of local solar jobs across the state. The bill was killed in committee by the Montana House Republicans. Less ambitious bills, bills that would have only modestly advanced our clean energy laws, can’t get out of committee either. The Montana Republicans kill every bill.
The current legislative session (65th) has seen 5 anti solar bills introduced (SB 7, SB 78, SB 154, HB 219) which are all making progress, and 3 pro solar bills (HB 34, HB 52, HB 504, SB 1), all of which have been killed in committee. On party line votes.
The bullheaded refusal of the Job Killing Republican legislators to consider policies even slightly friendly to renewable energy is not only disappointing, it’s actively and intentionally harmful to Montana’s future. Montana needs to develop a regulatory framework that encourages investment in and development of renewable energy.
We need legislators who can get that done.
If the current bunch won’t do that, we need to elect some that will.
Read more here:
Today's guest blogger is mountaindoc.
Why do we Resist? What is the Republican-controlled government doing that must be stopped?
Consider this: “MAKE America great again” is the current Republican slogan. But Republicans aren’t making anything. They’re tearing down America.
Making is the act of forming or creating something from parts, like making a cake or building a house. It implies a plan or recipe, and an envisioned result. I can imagine the beautiful cake or building I am creating. And I know I have to follow the recipe or blueprint in careful steps to get the desired result.
It’s a lot easier and faster to wreck up someone else’s birthday cake than to make your own. All you have to do is step on it. Or you can destroy their beautifully crafted building in a couple of hours with a wrecking ball. What’s left is a pile of rubble.
Republicans have no plan to make America a better place for all. Instead, they are taking a wrecking ball to every piece of legislation, regulation, or government institution they can. The idea is to take down as much as possible as fast as possible. If it’s something put into effect by the Obama administration, so much the better. There’s no thought to how real people’s lives will be affected. There’s no plan or vision for the future. And the result will only be a giant mess.
The Republican replacement plan for Obamacare would have left millions without insurance, millions who could not afford health care, and who would get sick or die. Republican roll back of clean water regulations means people will have unsafe drinking water and the environment will be permanently damaged. Republican planned roll back of Meals on Wheels means real people, mostly seniors and including veterans, will be hungry, malnourished, and possibly die.
The Republican wrecking ball has real life consequences for real people, for the planet, and for future generations. Our present government is imperfect, but it took years, often over hard won compromise, to craft what we have now. The goal has been to make America the kind of place where we all want to live. A place with quality education for all children, where people do not die because they can’t afford a doctor, where water is safe to drink, and where no one starves to death.
The Republican wrecking ball promises none of this. Republicans are destroying, not building. They take delight in wrecking what America has built, and in enriching those who already have most of America’s wealth. There’s no plan for a better, fairer, healthier and more educated country.
Republicans don’t seem to understand that we all prosper together or we all are destroyed together. Building and prospering together, taking care of each other and our environment, this is what makes America great.
Stop the Republican wrecking ball. Refuse to let Republicans destroy our country. Get involved now.
First do no harm
I'm still not running for office. But if I was, I'd have some policies out there so we could discuss them. Policies around bipartisan economic issues that move the economy forward. Things like education, public lands, energy, and infrastructure.
This is Montana, so we'll start with public lands. So here you go.
Montanans believe that public lands are our state’s greatest asset and must be protected for future generations.
This is not an extreme position. You can look it up. 78% of Montanans self-identify as conservationists. 58% of Montanans oppose the sale of public lands. 77% of Montanans want to keep current National Monuments in place. 88% percent say we should improve access to public lands. Protecting public lands and the environment is a Montana value. (source)
From a policy standpoint, that means opposing public land transfer, supporting conservation program budgets, protecting and funding our national parks, and reforming oil and gas development on public lands.
Public Lands Transfer
Montana has 25 million acres of federal land. These lands are our heritage. We are borrowing them from our children. Montanans want our elected representatives to fight efforts to transfer or sell our public lands. Powerful out-of-state special interests and their political allies are waging an aggressive campaign to sell off public lands in the west. These groups want to see our national lands privatized for short-term gain, at the expense of our shared American inheritance. Public land transfer threatens hundreds of millions of acres of national forests, rangelands, wildlife refuges, parks, wilderness areas, and historic sites across the west. Public land transfer also threatens the fundamental American notion that our public lands belong to everyone, and runs contrary to the Montana Constitution, which says these lands shall be held in trust for the people. Public lands exist for the good of all, not the profit of a few. Montanans oppose public land transfer, and we expect our elected representatives to echo that.
Conservation Program Budgets
Montanans support and fund conservation. The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) was created by Congress in 1965. It was a simple idea: use revenues from the depletion of one natural resource - offshore oil and gas - to support the conservation of another precious resource - our land and water. It works out to over $900 million in royalties paid by energy companies to create and protect national parks, areas around rivers and lakes, national forests, and national wildlife refuges from development, and to provide matching grants for state and local parks and recreation projects. Yet, nearly every year, Congress breaks its own promise to the American people and diverts much of this funding to other uses, or postpones and otherwise delays collection of the royalties. The LWCF should be fully funded and permanently reauthorized. Montanans expect our elected representatives to fight to protect the LWCF.
We face a $12.5 billion backlog of maintenance and repairs in the national parks system. National park tourism generates over $650 billion in local revenues across the country. Montana gets $180 million in economic benefit from Glacier Park alone. Proposed cuts to funding for maintenance and operations of national parks pose a significant risk to Montana’s recreation economy. 92% of Montanans say they want to improve and repair the infrastructure in national parks and outdoor destinations. Montanans expect our elected representatives to fight for full and permanent funding for our national parks.
Oil & Gas Development
Finally, we need to reform oil and gas development on public lands. We have regulations for a reason -- to protect our public lands, and our water. If we are going to extract oil and gas, we are going to have to protect the landscape and the environment, and that includes keeping our rivers clean. If the federal government is going to abdicate its responsibility to regulate environmental impact and downstream pollution, then the state of Montana is going to have to step in and protect the land and the citizens of Montana. Our state lawmakers need to act to protect Montanans and our environment, not out-of-state special interests.
We also need to make sure that the state of Montana is fairly and adequately compensated for oil and gas development. Montana has an oil and gas tax holiday - new oil and gas wells operate tax free on the first 18 months of production. That cost the state $265 million dollars (2008-2014), or an average of $37 million a year in foregone revenue. The oil and gas tax holiday gives preferential treatment to industry, and makes ordinary Montanans cover that hole in our revenues. Montanans expect our state legislature to come up with a reasonable, equitable solution where the oil and gas industry pays its fair share of taxes.
Montanans expect our elected representatives to protect our public lands. We expect them to oppose public land transfer, support conservation program budgets, protect and fund our national parks, and reform oil and gas development on public lands, including making sure those industries pay their fair share of taxes. Any representatives who don’t advocate and vote for those positions need to go. Vote ‘em out. Montanans deserve better.
I grew up in a politically aware and politically active family. My successful businessman grandfather went door to door with leaflets and ran the fundraising campaign for his precinct. He called it “carrying water for the elephant.” I knew other people who were yellow dog Democrats - they would vote for a yellow dog before they would vote for a Republican. Party loyalty was assumed. You might not feel strongly about a candidate, but if he (and they were always he) was your guy, you voted for him. Every time.
Those days are over, and the Democratic party needs to come to grips with that reality. Soon.
Some more facts:
Wait. Millennials are well educated, socially liberal, concerned with economic issues, and they don’t engage with political parties? Why not?
Buckle up, buttercup. You aren’t going to like this. While it’s convenient to blame young voters for being "lazy" and "just not “getting it,” there is substantial evidence that they do, in fact, get it. They get it so well that they want no part of it.
Millennials reject your constraints, and your platform. Millennials grew up using social media, which has allowed them to personalize which networks and groups they choose to affiliate with, and design their own platform of views. They have no qualms about picking their political beliefs one at a time, like making a playlist, rather than buying the whole album.
Millennials think your party structure is stupid. They prefer loose networks that allow them to personalize their views and form and shift relationships freely. Your party is not doing as much grassroots work, reaching out to young people, as you used to, so millennials don’t really interact with you at a personal level. They aren’t interested in your platform (see the playlist analogy above). Don’t feel too special. This also bad for churches.
Millennials think the whole party thing is stupid and corrupt. Political parties have been changed by campaign finance reforms, which restricted their ability to raise money while allowing anonymous outside entities to spend more. They see PACs and dark money groups dumping truckloads of money into elections, on both sides, and buying results.
All that said, a majority of millennials still vote for Democratic candidates, at least for now, and they make up about 19 percent of the vote (source). In the past, millennials have overwhelmingly voted Democratic, but that is changing. In 2008, 66 percent of voters age 18-29 voted for Obama. In 2012, that fell to 60 percent. In 2016, 55 percent of young voters chose Clinton. Here’s the awkward bit -- more young adults in 2016 than in 2012 supported a third-party candidate, did not vote for a presidential candidate, or “specifically chose not to answer this poll question.” (source)
So what does this mean? It means you can’t take millennial voters for granted. This is a generation that is politically mobilized and engaged. They are well informed, and they choose their positions on issues rather than just accepting a platform. They do not care about your party, and they do not think they owe you their vote. They are not willing to fall in line and submit to a system they see as rigged. They are not willing to vote for a candidate that they do not think has their best interest in mind, that they do not trust, and do not like.
If the Democratic party wants young voters to engage with the party and to develop party loyalty, the Democratic party is going to have to actively engage with young voters on their terms. We have to reach out to them on a personal level, and we have to use social media (in a smart way, not in an annoying, condescending way). We have to give them something to believe in. That means issues that matter -- like economics and the environment. We have to give them a future to vote for. Millennials turned out in record numbers during the 2016 primaries because they heard a message about economics, and inequality, and environmental issues, and a vision of a future where people could do great things. In the general election, they stayed home, voted third party, or left President blank.
Millennials are talking to us. We can hear them, or we can watch them walk away.
But if I was, I'd have some solid positions. Straight forward, sensible, and accessible.
Policies around bipartisan economic issues that move the economy forward. Things like education, public lands, and infrastructure.
Stay tuned to find out what those look like.